As we approach that day in May the montage of policies of
the incoming administration of President-Elect Muhammadu Buhari on all sectors
of Nigerian life will become less fuzzy. It is easy to deduce that due to the
ideological polarity of the incoming and outgoing governments, the changes
afoot will be sweeping. One of the sectors that is bracing itself in
anticipation of these changes is of course the nation’s prime industry, the oil and gas industry.
There is so much hope riding on the expected changes to the
industry; the PIB and eventual reorganisation and reform of the sector,
environmental remediation in the Niger delta, job creation, to mention just a
few.
An important but unasked question on the immediate future
plan of the industry is that of increased production in light of depressed
revenues. Pertinent to this is a re-strategising of the sector to give added
weight to local consumption against exports. Of importance is a consideration
of how much value the nation can derive from its oil if it is refined locally
into fuel and petrochemicals products for local consumption and export.
Weighing local value addition against export is a toss up between industrialisation,
innovation and job creation on one hand and liquid cash on the other. The
former improves the national economy and
standard of living of the populace and the latter oftentimes promotes
indolence, profligacy and corruption.
To focus the national attention to producing more oil and
not more export revenue from oil is not going to be an easy task after four to
five decades of singular focus to easy petrodollars. But seeing that those
petrodollars have not taken us very far in terms of national development a
change of focus should be an easy sell. Especially if the gains of the change
can be well articulated and sold to the citizens by a trusted political
leadership at a time when the nation’s balance of accounts is unfavourable and austerity and
prudence is forced on it.
In a lecture titled "The Strategic Importance of
Nigeria's Oil and Gas to Global Security and the World Economy" delivered
at her alma mater, Howard University, in the United States on a balmy April day
three years ago, out-going oil minister, Mrs. Diezani Allison-Madueke, outlined
the country’s oil
production ambition by the end of the decade. According to her, the ambition is
to raise Nigeria’s
reserve base to 40 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) and the daily production to 4m BOE by the
year 2020.
As is usual with such speeches given in such gatherings,
there was no supporting data to inform the audience if the current exploration
and production (E & P) infrastructure and assets in the country can support
that ambition, what strategic plans are afoot to achieve that or if there is
enough investment going into the sector to realise that.
Or more pertinently, why 4 million barrels per day? Why not
6, 8 or 5? Is there a reason behind the 4m BOE/D target? Does that figure
reflect a knowledge of what is possible under the circumstances at that time or
was it merely a reflection of the extent of our collective ambition for the
sector? Can we aspire for more? Is the plan to process the excess production
into products locally, request an upward review of export quota from OPEC or of shutting it in? I am sure there are
more questions that can be asked from the minister’s Statement of Intent.
Almost coincidentally, in February of that year, two months
earlier than the Minister’s
homecoming speech at Howard, Ian Craig, an executive vice-president of Royal
Dutch Shell stated at the 12th Annual Nigeria Oil & Gas Exhibition that his
company, Shell, alone, can produce 4m barrels of oil in Nigeria if the funding
issues and oil theft can be sorted by the Nigerian authorities.
The word ‘almost’ is used at the beginning of the above
paragraph because it is hard to fathom that Mrs. Allison-Madueke was unaware of
the above position from her former employers before her speech at Howard
University. But that is a discussion for another day.
The minister herself mentioned in that same speech that
with some deepwater projects coming on stream, Nigeria can add another one
million BOE/D from its current production ‘in the next few years’ (her words exactly). Since the country currently boasts of
37 billion barrels in reserves and produces 2.37m BOE/D then, going by this
plan, ‘in the next
few years’ the nation
would be only about 600,000 BOE/D short of the 4m daily production target.
Yes, ‘in
the next few years’ is
both ambiguous and noncommittal but considering that the context in which the
statement was made is as an additional rider to a stated target, then one can
interpret here that the ‘few
years’ were meant
to come earlier than the projected eight years (2012 - 2020).
Suffice it today that Mr. Craig’s offer of hitting the 4m BOE production refers to the
capacity of his company, Shell, only and not that of the entire nation and
considering that his company is the nations number one producer we can infer
here that if Shell alone, through its two companies, Shell Production and
Development Company (SPDC) and Shell Nigeria Exploration & Production
Company (SNEPCO) can take us to that promised land, then producing far more
than 4m per day is achievable if production from other operators such as
ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, Total and Agip, to mention only the major IOCs, is
factored in. Add to that the contribution of indigenous producers such as
Sapetro, Oando and Seplat.
So with some effort the a level greater than the 4m BOE/D
target is achievable. But before we roll out the drums from a celebratory ‘owambe’ let us consider a few points.
Oil revenue dependent economies normally adapt two
strategies in times lower oil price. One is to pump out more oil to compensate
for the revenue loss and the other is to process the produced crude into higher
value products for internal consumption or export which should also make up for
loss of revenue due to falling prices. Considering that the 4m BOE/D target was
mooted at a period of high oil price it is safe to assume the intention was
simply to increase capacity. Which makes it more apt to consider pursuing that
line of thinking now that oil price has fallen and it becomes a bit more
necessary to pump out more oil.
In addition, increasing production is dependent on Nigeria’s OPEC export quota at one end and
processing capacity for fuel and petrochemicals at the other. OPEC usually
considers a request for quota increase based on a country’s reserve base but, unfortunately,
Nigeria’s oil
reserves have not increased substantially in the last few years. Our refineries
are also still working far below capacity.
So despite the good intent of increased oil production, the
country will find it difficult under the current circumstances to push for an
increase in production unless, of course, ‘in the next few years’ an aggressive campaign for the rehabilitation of the
existing refineries, or building new ones, is commenced and an expanded E &
P offensive is launched to increase the nation’s reserve base. Of course, the preferred destination for
any additional barrel produced should be a Nigerian refinery and not an
ocean-going crude carrier.
But even if a justification is found for that push there is
currently a dearth of investment into the upstream sector because investors are
simply staying away due to the uncertainties surrounding both the content and
the future of the Petroleum Industry Bill, PIB.
The restiveness in the Niger Delta which has now greatly
abated did not help matters also as it forced many operators divest their
onshore producing assets. Few of such assets are now optimally producing.
So while the current low oil prices present us with an
excellent opportunity to expand our hydrocarbon output and improve our local
processing capacity we are, unfortunately, more likely to be held back by our
unpreparedness to take advantage of such an opportunity and all the benefits it
brings.
Expanding Nigeria’s capacity to process its hydrocarbons internally may be
the best thing to happen to the country’s march economic greatness. Whoever said lower oil export
earnings are all about doom and gloom?
No comments:
Post a Comment